AINewsScienceOpenAI announces three big science discoveries and a new way to work with academicsThis time OpenAI says it’s taking new advice from scientists on how to release the results.This time OpenAI says it’s taking new advice from scientists on how to release the results.by Richard LawlerOct 26, 2026, 11:34 PM UTCShareGiftImage: The VergePart OfAll the drama around AI’s takeover of mathematicssee all updates Richard Lawler is a senior editor following news across tech, culture, policy, and entertainment. He joined The Verge in 2021 after several years covering news at Engadget.Less than a month after its mass release of hundreds of manuscripts that it said contained solutions to long-standing mathematics questions, OpenAI is back with three more “major” discoveries in math, computer science, and physics. What’s different this time is the choice to have external experts that OpenAI describes as “shepherds” guiding the results in computer science and physics, while for the math problem it says that they advised it to release the AI output for researchers to work through their own explanations.OpenAI results added to GitHub today:Local smoothing for the Euclidean wave equation. The proof uses an auxiliary partial differential equation to establish Sogge’s local smoothing for waves in every spatial dimension at least two.
It also yields the Kakeya maximal and dimension conjectures and Stein’s spherical restriction estimates throughout the interior of the conjectured range. We are releasing the model output directly, as we did in our October 6 release.The Exponential Time Hypothesis is False. The paper gives a deterministic algorithm that exactly counts satisfying assignments of fixed-width CNF formulas in subexponential time and polynomial space. The case of 3-SAT refutes the Exponential Time Hypothesis.
An independent working group of computer scientists led by Russell Impagliazzo, Ramamohan Paturi, and Ryan Williams will examine and explain the proof. At the group’s request, we are making the materials public immediately so others can examine them as well.This approach could have its own issues, the company admits, and the AGMAI panel of math advisers OpenAI put together just said yesterday that “we recommend that AI companies do not adopt” the practices of designating certain people to receive the output first, citing unequal access, borrowed reputation, and biased selection as a few of the issues. Instead, they recommended that in the future, AI labs release output on scholarly repositories, with Lean-formalized proofs, info on how the problems were chosen, funding for people working on understanding the results, and other information.Related‘Pure insanity’: Mathematicians will need years to make sense of OpenAI’s latest dropAll the drama around AI’s takeover of mathematicsThe physics information has not been released in full, but is a “mathematically rigorous existence proof of certain interacting quantum field theories containing gauge fields and fermions in four dimensions, including Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) and a unified completion of the Standard Model of particle physics.” According to OpenAI, “David Gross will lead a group including Michael Douglas, Arthur Jaffe, Igor Klebanov, and Nikita Nekrasov that will shepherd this work.”The computer science collaboration is said to prove that the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), which has been widely believed to be true, is actually false. OpenAI says verification of the result will be guided by a group of three experts that includes UC San Diego’s Russell Impagliazzo and Ramamohan Paturi, who were part of the group that originally proposed it in 1999, as well as MIT professor Ryan Williams.
The group decided to release the AI output write-up and Lean proof on GitHub today.They also released an open letter to the community asking for input on how to examine the claim, and about setting norms for dealing with AI-generated breakthroughs:We would welcome discussion of three broader questions:What expectations should govern early access to AI-generated results, disclosure of conflicts of interest, and the use of unpublished material for subsequent research?How should credit recognize both new discoveries and the work of checking, fixing, simplifying, explaining, and extending them?How can we support students and researchers as methods and research directions change, while preserving the understanding and judgment needed to question results and develop new ideas?There’s similar documentation for the math breakthrough, where its model “produced a proof of the local smoothing conjecture in every dimension and therefore also resolve the Kakeya conjecture and Stein’s restriction conjecture in all dimensions.” Just a few months ago, NYU professor Hong Wang was awarded a prestigious Fields Medal by the International Mathematical Union for resolving the Kakeya conjecture in three dimensions.Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.Richard LawlerAINewsOpenAIScienceOpenAI is giving $5 million to help mathematicians make sense of AI-generated research.Robert HartOct 15‘Pure insanity’: Mathematicians will need years to make sense of OpenAI’s latest dropRobert HartOct 9OpenAI drops another batch of mathematical breakthroughsRobert HartOct 6Most PopularMicrosoft offers buyouts to 60,000 employeesA YouTuber dissected an iPhone Duo and thinks he found the cause of crackgateApple updates the iPad Mini with a larger OLED displayThe Gospel according to Peter (Thiel)r/opensource just banned AI, non-English speakers, and moreAdvertiser Content FromThis is the title for the native ad
